Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Felix Corwin vs Danylo Kalenichenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Corwin vs Kalenichenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Felix Corwin vs Danylo Kalenichenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Corwin 1 - 0 Kalenichenko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Corwin has won 45.03% of points on their second serve, while Kalenichenko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Corwin, in recent form, has won 51.46% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kalenichenko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.37% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Corwin has saved 57.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kalenichenko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Corwin has won 63.49% of matches played (W/L 40/ 23), with Kalenichenko winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Corwin has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 33/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 49/ 34). Kalenichenko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 39/ 29), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Corwin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.38% of matches (W/L 34/ 18), where as Kalenichenko has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Corwin winning 1 times and Kalenichenko being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Corwin winning 2 and Kalenichenko winning 0. The last match between Corwin and Kalenichenko was at the M25 Glasgow, 20-02-2019, First, I.hard with Felix Corwin getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Corwin and Kalenichenko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Corwin winning 0 times and Kalenichenko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Corwin winning 0, and Kalenichenko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Corwin has played against opponents with an average rank of 122.87 while Kalenichenko has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Corwin has won 59% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kalenichenko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Corwin has converted 41.31% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kalenichenko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
679
Rank
478
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
439
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
60% (219-149)
Career Total W/L
56% (239-186)
57% (13-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Corwin VS Kalenichenko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Felix Corwin | Danylo Kalenichenko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (29/47) | 57% (33/58) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (21/29) | 52% (17/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 67% (12/18) | 48% (12/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/3) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (29/58) | 30% (14/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Corwin VS Kalenichenko H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Felix Corwin
Player
Danylo Kalenichenko
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Felix Corwin | Danylo Kalenichenko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (13/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (29/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (283/275) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 103 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:50 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 140.57 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1024/1799) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (708/1024) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (349/775) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (88/213) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (790/1856) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 54% (7/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (12/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 78% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Felix Corwin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Bernard Tomic
Player
Felix Corwin
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Samuel Nicholson
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
76%
(
47 of
62)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Seita Watanabe
Player
Felix Corwin
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
50%
(
44 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
106)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hernan Casanova
Player
Felix Corwin
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
70%
(
57 of
82)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
108
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 6-7(8) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Jacob Brumm
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Ezequiel Simonit
51%
(
59 of
115)
1st Serve %
63%
(
73 of
116)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
45%
(
25 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
40 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
116)
124
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(3) 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Ivan Denisov
58%
(
47 of
81)
1st Serve %
57%
(
64 of
113)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
113)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
54 of
86)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Garrett Johns
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
6
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
47%
(
27 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
51 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
98)
117
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Danylo Kalenichenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tallon Griekspoor
Player
Danylo Kalenichenko
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
82%
(
59 of
72)
13
Aces
18
4
Double Faults
0
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
47 of
59)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
19 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(2) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danylo Kalenichenko
Player
Lukas Palovic
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
89%
(
48 of
54)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
50 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
22%
(
16 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
99)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Danylo Kalenichenko
Player
Martin Krumich
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Danylo Kalenichenko
Player
Uladzimir Ignatik
66%
(
52 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
9
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
32 of
40)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
16 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Uladzimir Ignatik
Player
Danylo Kalenichenko
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
13
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Danylo Kalenichenko
Player
Daniel Paty
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
11
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Danylo Kalenichenko
54%
(
44 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
29 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Danylo Kalenichenko
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Danylo Kalenichenko
Player
Otto Virtanen
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mate Valkusz
Player
Danylo Kalenichenko
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Corwin Vs Kalenichenko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
